Search for: "Burks v. State of Minnesota" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2007, 2:59 pm
Panel 3, She Blinded Me with Science: Gender Issues in Patent Law Moderated by Deven Desai, Thomas Jefferson Dan Burk, University of Minnesota, Do Patents Have Gender? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:23 am by Meg Martin
Burke delivered the decision.Link: http://tinyurl.com/25pxwkz . [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:40 am by Lawrence Solum
Three years later, as we await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by CJLF Staff
Several other Minnesota police agencies, including the Minnesota State Patrol, and the Burnsville Fire Department are looking to get their crews equipped with the cameras. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
March 15, 2004) (“duty to test . . . is not a separate cause of action under Minnesota law”); Kociemba v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:50 am
Dan Burk, University of Minnesota Law SchoolThe Role of Intellectual Property in CodificationAbstract By codification Burk means conversion of tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]