Search for: "Burlington Northern Railway Co"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:47 am
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California secretly tested workers for sickle cell trait and other genetic disorders from the 1960s through 1993; workers were told it was routine cholesterol screening.In another incident, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. paid 36 employees $2.2 million in 2002 to settle a lawsuit in which the workers claimed the company sought to genetically test them without their knowledge after they had submitted… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:42 am
” Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern& Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
And, the Roberts Court also decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008)(Bullard plaintiffs request to a stipulation to a trial covering fewer than 100 plaintiffs required under CAFA for an action to be deemed a “mass action” did not impact CAFA jurisdiction.). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:17 pm
Burlington Northern R.R. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am
It also argued that the state high court had not adopted Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
However, the US government through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in 2001 against the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. under the Americans with Disabilities Act for secretly testing some workers for a genetic defect that some believe can predispose a person to carpal tunnel syndrome. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Last week the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision in Yee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court decision of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:29 am
Moreover, although the employer also argued that the “material adversity” standard outlined in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:02 am
After careful analysis of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
BNSF Railway Co., 2009 WL 2731154 (D. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
See also Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
