Search for: "Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway"
Results 101 - 120
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:47 am
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California secretly tested workers for sickle cell trait and other genetic disorders from the 1960s through 1993; workers were told it was routine cholesterol screening.In another incident, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. paid 36 employees $2.2 million in 2002 to settle a lawsuit in which the workers claimed the company sought to genetically test them without their knowledge after they had… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:42 am
” Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern& Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
In March 2011, A crash involving a van containing Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad workers and a BNSF freight train occurred at a crossing in a rail yard in Kelso, Washington (WA), That crash killed three of the rail employees and left a fourth man in the vehicle with severe injuries. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
And, the Roberts Court also decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008)(Bullard plaintiffs request to a stipulation to a trial covering fewer than 100 plaintiffs required under CAFA for an action to be deemed a “mass action” did not impact CAFA jurisdiction.). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:17 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, 18-8027 (7th Cir.) presents essentially the same question as Richardson but is an appeal from a decision in favor of the plaintiff instead of against him. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am
It also argued that the state high court had not adopted Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
However, the US government through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in 2001 against the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. under the Americans with Disabilities Act for secretly testing some workers for a genetic defect that some believe can predispose a person to carpal tunnel syndrome. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court decision of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Rose is a director of AMR Corporation; BNSF Railway Company; and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:29 am
Moreover, although the employer also argued that the “material adversity” standard outlined in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:02 am
After careful analysis of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Last week the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision in Yee v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 129 S. [read post]
