Search for: "Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company "
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
Yes, you are reading that right: BNSF — the company formerly known as Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway — is arguing for a higher tax bill. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern& Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
Fear obesity could lead to other conditions supports rejected applicant’s regarded-as disabled claim
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. , March 5, 2018, Coleman, S.). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:31 am
The Supreme Court got it right in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
And, the Roberts Court also decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm
The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:47 am
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California secretly tested workers for sickle cell trait and other genetic disorders from the 1960s through 1993; workers were told it was routine cholesterol screening.In another incident, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. paid 36 employees $2.2 million in 2002 to settle a lawsuit in which the workers claimed the company sought to genetically test them without their knowledge after they had… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:00 am
Rose is a director of AMR Corporation; BNSF Railway Company; and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Louisiana) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply ______________________ Docket: 07-1601; 07-1607 Title: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Supreme Court handed down its 8 to 1 decision in the much anticipated case of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm
As its authority the Fifth Circuit cited Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
However, the US government through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in 2001 against the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. under the Americans with Disabilities Act for secretly testing some workers for a genetic defect that some believe can predispose a person to carpal tunnel syndrome. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
Supreme Court decision of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
North America's largest railroad companies have all posted stock price growth during the same period--Union Pacific (131 percent), Norfolk Southern (185 percent), Burlington Northern Santa Fe (257 percent), and Canadian National (154 percent)--though none as pronounced as CSX's share gain. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, 129 S. [read post]
