Search for: "Burns v. Ford Motor Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 11:12 am
(Citing Burns v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:53 am
Ford Motor Company, No. 110096, reversed a $43 million judgment in a 5-0 vote. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 3:59 pm
Ford Motor Company, No. 5-05-0723 affirmed a jury verdict for $43 million, including $15 million in punitive damages. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
When the 7.3 Ford gas engine hit the scene in late 2019, it was framed as a best-in-class powerhouse motor. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:08 pm
Ford Motor Company, in which a California appellate court ultimately upheld a compensatory damages award of $2.5 million and punitive damages of $3.5 million against Ford, ostensibly because Ford had been aware of the design defects for several years but had decided against altering the design. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Ford Motor Co., 2007 WL 3087959 (Oct.4, 2007) (certifying class of consumers alleging design defects in the placement of fuel tanks in CVPI and other Panther-platform vehicles) Miller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 7:38 am
Highway 27 when he struck a Ford Expedition driven by plaintiff. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:38 am
Ford Motor Company, 806 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2001). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:38 am
Ford Motor Company, 806 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2001). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:02 am
Ford Motor Company, 806 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2001). [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:41 am
Ford Motor Company was based on the theory of a design defect. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Wright, Thompson Hine LLP, Cleveland, for Appellant Ford Motor Company Robert W. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
Ford Motor Company for wrongful death. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:13 am
Ford Motor Company). [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Ford was quoted: "Probably nothing so well advertised the Ford car and the Ford Motor Company as did this suit. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:04 pm
Ford Motor fame)]. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
” Grimshaw vs Ford marked a change in liability cases In 1978, the Ford Motor Company was found responsible for $127.8 million in damages for the wrongful death of Ford Pinto driver Lily Gray and the personal injuries sustained by her 13-year-old passenger, Richard Grimshaw. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am
” Grimshaw vs Ford marked a change in liability cases In 1978, the Ford Motor Company was found responsible for $127.8 million in damages for the wrongful death of Ford Pinto driver Lily Gray and the personal injuries sustained by her 13-year-old passenger, Richard Grimshaw. [read post]
