Search for: "Bushco "
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 6:42 pm
Hillary Clinton writes today: There appears to be no crisis, tragedy or disaster immune from exploitation under the Bush administration. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 10:49 am
Bottom line: Bushco officials can spin it however they want but the documents speak for themselves and with excellent analyses like Marcy's, the truth will come out. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 10:22 am
After all, Fred Fielding can’t very well claim executive privilege prevents Fitzgerald from investigating the RNC servers, since BushCo has already turned over the crown jewels, the morning Vice Presidential Daily Briefings, so as to appear to be cooperating with Fitzgerald’s investigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 2:24 pm
If your primary intent is to extract information, with the sadism just an added bonus, the torture is legal according to BushCo. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:15 pm
Come to think of it, BushCo has been promising withdrawal since 2003: According to a March 3, 2003, CNN report, "Rumsfeld said the post-war troop commitment would be less than the number of troops required to win the war. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:32 am
Of all the "misleading" things done by BushCo to call out, this one seem rather minor. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:50 am
From The Hill: Senior U.S. officials authorized the use of aggressive interrogation techniques resulting in the abuse of military detainees in U.S. custody, according to a report released by the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:44 pm
That is what BushCo has wrought. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 9:58 am
Might as well let some BushCo flunkie deliver the Bush Report. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:25 pm
In the Jack Ryan (played by Harrison Ford) movie "Clear And Present Danger," the CIA Director of Operations Robert Ritter pulls out a letter of authorization from the White House for an illegal action and exclaims to Jack Ryan: Ritter: I have an *autographed get-out-of-jail-free card*! [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:22 am
The NYTimes wrote today in an editorial: Mr. [read post]
Congressional Dem Leaders Must Provide Answers To Cheney's Charge of Complicity In BushCo Illegality
22 Dec 2008, 1:50 pm
Glenn Greenwald writes in more detail on the statements by Vice President Dick Cheney that directly implicate the top Congressional leaders on intelligence matters. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
BushCo officials defy them. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 2:01 pm
Sherrod Brown, populist Dem Senator of Ohio, likely to be blasting BushCo and the Paulson proposal. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:48 am
(It was just the Intell leaders at that point, and not the party leaders, because BushCo went on a snit after Richard Shelby leaked the news that the NSA had had an intercept from Al Qaeda before 9/11, and cut back who it briefed even more than normal; finally, though, the leaders rebelled and they began to get briefed on the big secrets too.) [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:18 am
In Bushco v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 6:32 pm
Nadler points out that this is retroactive leglaization of BushCo illegality. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:26 pm
Andif they are theocratic rogue states that have said Israel should be wiped off the face of the map, andif we know for a fact (as we do), that the Israelis will strike first before they allow such a theocratic rogue state to build a nuclear weapon, andthat there’s probably nothing we can say to stop the Israelis from launching that sort of an, especially at present when the Israeli government is so weak (and when lots of folks in our own Pentagon — and not just the political appointees… [read post]
22 May 2007, 9:00 am
Joe Klein writes: This much I can confirm: there is growing pessimism among U.S. officials about the possibility of the long-sought political deal amongst Shi'ites and Sunnis and Kurds. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, Part I, and Part II of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
