Search for: "C&B Operations, LLC"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
By 2013, when trial began, the other three LLC members continued to operate the MRI facility at one HHC hospital. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Worth, Texas based CSC Applied Technologies, LLC. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Those actions include selling major LLC assets and dissolving the LLC. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:02 pm
B. [read post]
6 Sep 2005, 7:53 am
Assume also that Employee C is hired by Contractor A and performs some work for Principal B, and is hurt on Principal B's job-site. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:38 pm
On December 1, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged GAW Miners, LLC (“GAW Miners”), ZenMiner, LLC (“ZenMiner”) and Homero Joshua Garza (“Garza”) the managing member of both GAW Miners and ZenMiner (together the, “Defendants”) with fraud under (i) Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and (ii) Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities… [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm
So, while the ALJ decided that Parah satisfied prong C because he operated through a registered LLC, SCOV finds that this fact was enough to exempt Parah from the ABC analysis completely. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
The original charging order philosophy protected guys A, B from having to accept D as an unwanted partner if C, the person they originally went into business with gets sued. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
Border Transportation Group, LLC, No. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:08 am
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)Motion of the Debtors and Debtors in Possession for Entry of Interim and Final Orders Establishing Adequate Assurance Procedures with Respect to their Utility Providers Pursuant to Section 366 of the Bankruptcy Code Filed By PJ Finance Company, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C)Motion of Debtors and Debtors in Possession for an Order Authorizing them to Pay Prepetition Employee Wages, Benefits,… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
The County had the false belief that a distinction exists for purposes of the court’s review that the “lake” parcel has C–4 zoning and the “tavern” parcel has B–3 zoning. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:33 am
Here, in a nutshell, is what happened in Saleeby as described in Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm
Border Transportation Group, LLC, analyzes the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:14 am
Lovemore LLC, No. 09 C 3555, Slip. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
., No. 10 C 1894, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
(b) when asked to determine whether the parties have chosen to subject themselves to the supervisory power of a foreign court—-or (c)—something which is different and arguably even a lesser thing still—have chosen to be governed by a foreign law. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
American Commercial Lines LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
Under these circumstances, the motion record supported Judge Klein’s decision that the continued operation of plaintiff with Carroll as a member was “not reasonably practicable” under N.J.S.A. 42:2B-24(b)(3)(c). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:17 am
§ 512(k)(1)(B). [read post]
