Search for: "C&D Fishing Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Xerox Corp., 718 P.2d 929 (Alaska 1986), the court was “persuaded by the comments to the Restatement (Second) of Torts §500, which define reckless disregard of safety. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”   Didn’t work out in US b/c of SCt decisions in the 1970s that undermined the legal foundation of the right. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
Fish and Wildlife - Great Lakes [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:19 am
" In re B & D Dental Corp., Serial No. 85591438 (July 25, 2014) [not precedential].TASTY FISH CO. for seafood [FISH CO. disclaimed]. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
California Department of Fish and Game and Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am by Bexis
[C]ourts and the FDA have recognized the propriety and potential public value of unapproved or off-label drug use.United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality, (E) Endangered Species, (F) NEPA, (G) Mining / Oil & Gas, and (H) Cultural Resources.A. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
Thus, when viewed with the public interest in mind, the Court is reluctant to allow any fishing-expedition discovery when all a plaintiff has is an IP address—the burden is on the plaintiff to find other ways to more precisely identify the accused infringer without causing collateral damage. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  Most on point – and we’d say a fortiori – is Giovanetti v. [read post]