Search for: "C/O Mich" Results 1 - 20 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Raymond C O'Brien (Catholic University of America), Private Caregiver Presumption for Elder Caregivers, U. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
  Article I, Section 9 states that “[n]o Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:29 am by centerforartlaw
By Natalie Glitz Grumhaus There are many reasons that a nonprofit foundation may feel the need to dissolve.[1] When James and Charlotte Brooks Foundation decided to fully dissolve in 2015, only five years after its founding in 2010, they donated most of the Brooks’ artwork to a local art museum, the Parrish, as a way to further the Foundation’s purpose as an artist-endowed institution, dedicated to the Long Island arts community.[2] Another organization, the Urban Institute of… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
Rev. 197, 228 (2017); see Ann Woolhandler & Caleb Nelson, Does History Defeat Standing Doctrine, 102 Mich. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal ‘A Perpetual Motion Machine’: How disinformation drives voting laws New York Times – Maggie Astor | Published: 5/13/2021 Former President Trump’s months-long campaign to delegitimize the 2020 election did not overturn the results. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
’ [citing Craig Joyce, “The Rise of the Supreme Court Reporter An Institutional Perspective on Marshall Court Ascendancy, 83 Mich. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
Goldman Answer:  Section 230 has three operative provisions: (1) Section 230(c)(1): websites aren’t liable for third-party content. (2) Section 230(c)(2)(A): no liability for filtering decisions. (3) Section 230(c)(2)(B): no liability for filtering instructions. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]