Search for: "C Lillie" Results 61 - 80 of 440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
 In the meantime, here they are in outline:Case C‑443/12, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Sanofi, Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb SNC intervening, noted on The SPC Blog here. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:28 pm
October 30, 2008): Campbell was extremely nervous when Deputy Lilly approached the car. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:42 am by Michael Geist
The only real addition was a three year review, which ironically is a favourite giveaway for the Conservatives to the opposition (reviews were added to C-13 and C-36 over the past two months) when it seeks to show a willingness to compromise but not actually change anything of substance. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am by Eszter Szakács
The reason for the rejection followed from the HIPO’s analysis of the CJEU’s C-493/12 Eli Lilly judgment which – in the interpretation of the HIPO – required that at least the description of the patent should concretely refer to the active ingredient that is defined only functionally in the claim, in this case, rosuvastatin. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am by Sophie Corke
The Fashion Law reported on a recent US case - involving Tom Ford lipstick, a photo on Cardi B's Instagram, XXL magazine, and the photographer who originally took the photo - in which the matter was determined to be fair use.PatentsThe CJEU's judgment in Case C-673/18 Santen to abolish SPCs for new therapeutic applications, following the Advocate General's recommendation to reverse its prior finding in Case C-130/11 Neurim, has attracted significant… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:10 pm
Lilly’s undisputed testimony established that Crawley told Lilly he could search the “inside” of the car before Lilly issued the summonses to Allen. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
La inmensa mayoría, 75%, desconoce los cambios hechos al Código de Rentas Internas para incentivar la filantropía. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
NJ.com on June 17, 2012 released the following: “By Ted Sherman/The Star-Ledger The Eli Lilly warehouse in Enfield, Conn., is a nondescript beige building with a pebbled concrete exterior, just off Freshwater Boulevard. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
NJ.com on June 17, 2012 released the following: “By Ted Sherman/The Star-Ledger The Eli Lilly warehouse in Enfield, Conn., is a nondescript beige building with a pebbled concrete exterior, just off Freshwater Boulevard. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:09 am by Philipp Widera
Before actually dealing with Teva, he walked the audience through Medeva, Actavis v Sanofi (C-443/12) as well as Eli Lilly v HGS (C-493/12) (both judgments issued on 12 December 2013). [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:22 am
Awaiting Warner-Lambert v ActavisOver at the IP Alchemist blog, former Kat Darren Smyth takes a look at the recent decision from the CJEU in the case of Teva v Gilead C-121/17: Teva v Gilead – C-121/17 provides some clarity on combination products. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 2:49 am by Robin Shea
The agency says it has the authority under Section 709(c) of Title VII, which is the authority it uses to require EEO-1 reports in the first place. [read post]