Search for: "C Hemphill"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Scott Hemphill and Nancy L. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
For the Crown to prove that an indecent act has been committed, according to the seminal case R v Labaye (2005, SCC 80 (CanLII), [2005] 3 SCR 728) the Crown must show that: By its nature, the conduct at issue causes harm or presents a significant risk of harm to individuals or society in a way that undermines or threatens to undermine a value reflected in and thus formally endorsed through the Constitution or similar fundamental laws by, for example: a) confronting members of the public with… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:00 am
Antitrust and Trademark Settlements C. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
Hemphill CS, Sampat BN. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
SS 595/1 9 1/20/22 20-637 Hemphill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
SS 595/1 9 1/20/22 20-637 Hemphill v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[C.] [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm
C. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 6:29 am
Posted by Martin C. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:30 am
A Study of Exclusionary Coalitions: The Canadian Sugar Coalition, 1888–1889 By: John Asker; C. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Jorge C. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
But causality is difficult b/c there are so many breaches—even if you experience identity theft, which breach led to that theft? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
C. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Responding to C. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:00 am
C. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
C. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 10:42 pm
Scott Hemphill of NYU LawIt makes strong intuitive sense that as a trademark grows increasingly famous, the likelihood that consumers will confuse similar marks with it declines. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:23 am
Professors Barton Beebe and C. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:16 am
Always an interesting topic ...Hemphill, C. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
That was chosen b/c Nike was a strong mark. [read post]
