Search for: "C T Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 7,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 9:40 am by David Hiersekorn
 It can be taxed as a C Corp, which means that the corporation is a taxpayer and income is taxed at the corporate level, and again at the individual level when owners are paid a salary or dividends. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:03 pm by LindaMBeale
S corporations are ordinary "C corporations" that have made an election that permits qualifying corporations to avoid the corporate level tax and pass through the tax items (income, deductions, etc.) to the S corporation shareholders. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:01 pm
  Or are corporate boards just afraid to test the waters by paying normal amounts (OK, high amounts, but within some bounds of reason) to C-level officers, and by letting some of their employees abandon ship? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 6:37 am by Colby Pastre
However, this analysis doesn’t take into account the second layer of tax on C corporations. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm by buslawblogger
The question presented is whether corporations have cognizable "personal privacy" rights under Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act that they can assert... [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:42 am by Kate Fort
For the years at issue P attempted to file consolidated returns with C, another corporation wholly owned by T. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:04 am
You have heard of S Corporations and C Corporations. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm by Frank Pasquale
Proposals like the SPA and tougher disclosure rules would help put campaign finance back in the limelight it deserves, lest books like David C. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 5:14 pm
In British Columbia, Part 3, Division 3, of the Financial Institutions Act, RSBC 1996, c. 141, permits "a trust company, an extraprovincial trust corporation or a credit union that has a business authorization to carry on trust business", a law corporation, and a licensed trustee in bankruptcy to engage in a trust business. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 8:16 am by Daniel Shaviro
Pre-2017, however, when the rate difference was only 35 percent corporate versus 39.6 top rate for individuals, the conventional wisdom was that you just shouldn’t be a C corporation unless your aim of being publicly traded effectively forced it on you.The literature offered some interesting answers to why there might be private C corporations. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:00 am by Bryn Miller
“Monster, similar to the other corporations involved in these lawsuits, publicly asserts that their diversity is a ‘tremendous asset,’ yet they don’t have a single Black or minority senior executive or board member,” said Ruth Bond, an attorney for three plaintiffs and a partner at Renne Public Law Group. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 5:38 am
This isn’t to say that executives were uniformly negative in their assessment. [read post]