Search for: "C-Port, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
The picturesque Village of Sag Harbor, New York, located on eastern Long Island, was a major whaling port through the mid 1800s, became a blue collar industrial town for the next 100 or so years, and eventually took on its current character as a summer resort and second-home favorite of the Hamptons crowd. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
The picturesque Village of Sag Harbor, New York, located on eastern Long Island, was a major whaling port through the mid 1800s, became a blue collar industrial town for the next 100 or so years, and eventually took on its current character as a summer resort and second-home favorite of the Hamptons crowd. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
| EPO BoA plays better in 10 men | Maps and databases in C-490/14 Verlag Esterbauer | Yoga and copyright | Reid Hoffman and networks | The Lyrica patent dispute | TPP backlash. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 3:18 pm by Stuart Kaplow
For guidance, refer to the current version of LEED BD+C: IPpc 144 Social Equity within the Supply Chain credit. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Finally, the Port denied the allegation that it was the Project proponent, raising questions about the [CC&C’s] admission and warranting further inquiry. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
California State Lands Commission, et al (San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC, et al) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 5450294. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:56 pm by Holman
On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed, explaining: We are bound by our precedent in C R Bard Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm by Alex Gasser
  According to the complaint, a domestic industry exists under Subpart (C) of Section 337(a)(3) by virtue of Trek’s substantial investment in the exploitation of the asserted patents. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The plaintiff alleges that the practice constituted a tort under s. 3(2) of the Privacy Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 373. [read post]