Search for: "C-Terminal, LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 10:23 am by Kayla A. Haines, Esq.
Upon the termination of the need for a custodian, the members or managers should negotiate and decide on a deadlock-breaking mechanism to resolve future deadlocks just in case the need to break a deadlock arises again. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 12:34 pm by Kenneth B. Weckstein
”  The notice of appeal was signed by “[c]ounsel for First Kuwaiti…appealing in the name of Aurora, LLC. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
K12, INC., a Delaware Corporation, K12 FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees. 11th Circuit. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:28 am by Peter Mahler
The preliminary injunction will terminate 30 days from the date of this order if plaintiffs have not served amended complaints seeking judicial dissolution of Sugar LI, LLC. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm by PaulKostro
NATIVIDAD SANTIAGO; BETSY SANTIAGO; and MAZIE, SLATER, KATZ and FREEMAN, LLC, App. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, these errors included a failure to include language required by Commission Rule 210.21(c)(3)(i)(A)(4), an addition of qualifying language to statements required by Commission Rule 210.21(c)(3)(i)(B)(2), and an inclusion of statements that went beyond the language permitted by Commission Rule 210.21(c)(3)(i)(C). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
., doing business as Renosol Seating LLC, and three of its managers for suspending and terminating employees who reported workplace hazards in violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
., doing business as Renosol Seating LLC, and three of its managers for suspending and terminating employees who reported workplace hazards in violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
As the Court framed the issues: [D]efendants argue that: (1) the copy of the operating agreement plaintiff provided is only signed by three of the 14 members of defendant 391 Broadway LLC and therefore unenforceable; [and] (2) the operating agreement was entered into more than six months after 391 Broadway LLC filed its Articles of Organization and is therefore invalid under § 417 (c) of New York Limited Liability Law. [read post]