Search for: "C. D. Ingram" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  He was convicted of stealing $11,000 from his grandmother, based on the fact that (A) he knew where grandma kept the money, and had a key to her house, (B) there was no sign of break-in when the grandmother found money missing, (C) shortly after the money went missing, Ingram opened an account with a deposit of $9,900, despite (D) never having held a job, as best anyone can figure. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:43 am by sally
Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Nazir and others [2012] EWHC 2163 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 236 “Section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 had extraterritorial effect. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm by Susan Brenner
On May 6, 2008, a grand jury indicted Ingram on one count of the possession of crack cocaine, in violation of [Ohio Revised Code § 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(e)], and an attendant forfeiture specification. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:47 am
A declaration that the Revenue Sharing Agreement and USHE's threatened action against VPD and Ingram violate the Sherman Antitrust Act; d. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 9:59 pm
But top in-house lawyers at SuperConference so far include GCs for Cisco Systems, Chevron Philips, LG Electronics, Ingram Industries, WESCO International, Xerox, Microsoft, Whirlpool, Office Depot, Union Pacific, TV One, C-SPAN, FMC Technologies, the DNC, the Milwaukee Brewers, and many more "majors" you'd recognize. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 10:28 pm
Top in-house lawyers at SuperConference so far include GCs for Cisco Systems, Chevron Philips, LG Electronics, Ingram Industries, WESCO International, Office Depot, Whirlpool, Union Pacific, TV One, C-SPAN, FMC Technologies, Verizon, Microsoft, Xerox, the DNC, the Milwaukee Brewers and lots more "majors" you'd recognize. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
  Neither company would appear to be a direct infringer of a patent claim reciting steps A, B, C, and D. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Procureur général du Québec c. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Darren
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]