Search for: "C. SCHUMER" Results 81 - 100 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 5:49 pm
We're in a jury selection mood lately, so here are Rumpole's "Rules Of Voir Dire" (c) 2017 Justice Building Blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:21 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This appears to be happening in the case of Sovaldi, the Hepatitis C drug. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:34 am by Guest Blogger
   The fact this is not the case is evidence of the court packing Jimmy Carter and Chuck Schumer have been engaged in.Voters who told pollsters in 2016 that they cared more about judicial selection broke heavily in favor of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
The 5th edition of this incredibly valuable resource was recdently published, providing guidance to nonprofit advocates seeking to maximize their impact by creating and operating 501(c)(3)s, 501(c)(4)s, and political organizations.] [read post]
22 May 2008, 10:13 pm
Others go to the core of the KIDS Act, claiming the mistake is in requiring convicted sex offenders to register their e-mail addresses.One such advocate is the Reverend C. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Hill, Ryan Owens and Ryan Black discuss a recent survey in which they asked members of the Supreme Court bar for their views on nationwide injunctions, and found that “71 percent of respondents believed the [Supreme C]ourt should step in and clarify the law. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:22 pm
(C) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS- The provisions of subsections (a), (d), (e), (f), (h), (j), (k), and (l) of section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act shall apply with respect to the extension of a period under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to the same extent and in the same manner as such provisions apply with respect to the extension of a period under subsection (b) or (c) of section 505A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-04-04 https://t.co/JwD3CIiptw 2020-04-05 Trade mark infringement and passing off found Natural Instinct Ltd v Natures Menu Ltd [2020] EWHC 617 (IPEC) (20 Ma… https://t.co/1gKjdtvoai 2020-04-07 Public policy associated with arbitrations leaves materials confidential 79411 USA Inc. c. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 8:32 am by Simon Lester
  I suppose the U.S. could argue under GATS Article XIV(c) that this is necessary to secure compliance with GATS-consistent laws, but that seems like a stretch. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 5:54 pm
Wolkoff, Chairman and Chief Execitive of the American Stock Exchange, kicks off (here) with a reference to Roel C. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:25 am by Broc Romanek
- Pursuant to Section 408(c) of Sarbanes-Oxley, the SEC is reviewing a company's filings every three years; an analysis of SEC comment letters, however, show a more frequent oversight of the larger companies, particularly in the last three years, with over 65% of the Russell 1000 receiving a letter in each calendar years and over 50% of the Russell 2000 receiving a letter. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Joe Markowitz
  Senator Schumer is quoted in Politico as saying that as a result of this pressure, the Democrats "have the upper hand. [read post]