Search for: "C. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Moll (University of Houston), on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: close corporations, Closely-held corporations, contractual formalism, corporation, formalism, oppression, reasonable expectations, shareholder oppression, Shareholders Action Items for Boards: Where Directors and C-Suite Leaders Align and Diverge Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: Board performance,… [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Moll (University of Houston), on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: close corporations, Closely-held corporations, contractual formalism, corporation, formalism, oppression, reasonable expectations, shareholder oppression, Shareholders Action Items for Boards: Where Directors and C-Suite Leaders Align and Diverge Posted by Frank Kurre, Protiviti; Mark Rogers, BoardProspects; and Michael Tae, Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, on Tuesday, April 30, 2024 Tags: Board performance,… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
In 2015 she married William Smith. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 7:32 pm
Reed Smith will continue to follow developments with regard to the FDA’s regulation. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:38 am
By Divya Srinivasan The photographic documentation of the deceased body has occurred for decades. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Austin Smith also triggered a civil referral from the Arizona secretary of state to the attorney general. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
Reed Smith will continue to monitor this rule and future efforts by CMS to regulate MA plans and Part D plans. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Here, Special Counsel Jack Smith is an Emperor who wears no clothes.The post Special Counsel Jack Smith Lacks Standing to Defend the D.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
Consent Subsection 2(c) of s. 56.1(1) of the Criminal Code also provides for lawful procuring of identity documents, provided that consent has been provided. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
” Robert Costello—Costello is “Lawyer C” in the statement of facts. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
It could also affect the proceedings in the case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump in a federal court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm
(Proposed 37 CFR 42.75(c)(2)). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:30 am
Don’t Claim to Be an Expert Rule 7.2(c) prohibits lawyers from “stating or implying” that they are experts or certified specialists without proper certification from a state bar or an accredited certifying organization. [read post]
