Search for: "C. v. Berlin"
Results 41 - 60
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:57 am
... to LuxembourgThe questions to the CJEUFurther to the CJEU reference, the questions in VG Media Gesellschaft zur Verwertung der Urheber- und Leistungsschutzrechte von Medienunternehmen mbH v Google Inc, C-299/17, have been finalized and are now available on the Curia website.They are:1. [read post]
27 May 2007, 7:48 pm
. v. Republic of China (Taiwan), No. 05-2311, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-18 November 2010… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:01 am
Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:03 am
C. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:17 am
Georgia Television Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
& Anor v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:16 pm
Environmental water : advances in treatment, remediation and recycling / V. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
& Anor v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
& Anor v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
& Anor v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 10:30 am
” It held in “Claudia Wegener v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Hanson v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 1048 (QB). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
A good example is Case C‑387/12, Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesgerichtshof, the Fourth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which had to address a set of the sort of facts that crop up surprisingly often in real life but which generally don't get litigated on account of the expense, inconvenience and uncertainty inherent in them.Back in February 2003 Uwe Spoering, a photographer, took… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi v The Security Service heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office v Tariq, heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| Plant variety in Case C‑242/14 | US Supreme Court on spiderman patent | Hospira v Genentech saga | Are EU policy-makers fighting the right copyright battles? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
The claimant brought a claim in (a) libel; (b) harassment; and (c) for breach of the GDPR against ‘Person(s) Unknown’ defined as being the authors, editors and publishers of the website. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Contact the Law Office of Scott C. [read post]
