Search for: "C.O. Peters" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
C.O., 2010 BCSC 1872 (CanLII) concluded that in deciding whether to allow a litigant to proceed by way of pseudonym in a judicial review application the court is required to consider : whether there is any extraordinarily sensitive personal information about the physician, the complainant or a third party; whether the party affected objects to the disclosure; and whether disclosure of the information would undermine the very purpose of the judicial review application. [read post]