Search for: "CALIFORNIA BAR ASSOCATION, Officers of the Court" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
He is editor and coauthor of Exactions and Impact Fees in California, published by Solano Press, and serves as an expert witness on California land use law. [read post]
He is editor and coauthor of Exactions and Impact Fees in California, published by Solano Press, and serves as an expert witness on California land use law. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
The plaintiffs, persons and entities involved with the production and circulation of that advertisement, contend the statute on its face violates the First Amendment and seek a preliminary injunction barring enforcement. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Hall,[11] the court specifically rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the damage done to his property, his herd of sheep, was “entire. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
The only group that filed an argument opposing the repeal was the California State Sheriffs’ Assocation. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Here, for instance, such a suit might be intended to deter other past or present employees from criticizing MZ—an effect that would violate the public policy manifested in California statutory law, which prohibits employer restrictions on, or punishment for, speech regarding conditions of employment…. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
Taxpayers generally have the right to take their cases to court. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
See image of Trustee's Deed recorded in the Harris County Clerk's Office below: FIRST THE DUNNING, THEN THE DEED Section 1692e(5) prohibits threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken, while  Section 1692e(2) prohibits falsely representing . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994) 5, 7, 10 Computer Assocs. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Paul Storer, UK IP Office Mostly been working on reforming patent court. [read post]