Search for: "CALIFORNIANS AGAINST ELIMINATING BASIC RIGHTS" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Is your face truly your own, or is it a commodity to be sold, a weapon to be used against you? [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm by John Ross
District court: Dobbs eliminated any right to abortion, so I don't see how you can have standing at all. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * Will California Eliminate Anonymous Web Browsing? [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
But the concurring opinion of justices Gorsuch and Alito clearly rests on a foundation supplied by the Separation of Powers clause and federalism.[19] They make clear that if the Major Questions doctrine was once an “ambiguity canon,” it is no longer simply that, but instead has become in their view the major protection against intrusion by agencies into the constitutional spheres given to Congress and the states. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
” Not sure what this means, especially in light of the CPRA’s detailed provisions about how consumers can exercise privacy rights. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 1:31 am by Michael Ehline
Premiums In basic terms, premiums roughly translate into payments. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that neither time period feels right is a sign that the bill’s underlying architecture is troublesome. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Patricia Hughes
Vaccine Choice Canada frames this challenge as follows: “Violates the right against compelled speech, under s.2(b) of the Charter in being forced to sign, under oath, a Statement with which they disagree, and for which there is no conclusive proof, in being forced to acknowledge that to not vaccinate places their children at risk of physical injury or death. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 12:44 am by Chris Manes
This myth is usually accompanied by mentioning a few high profile cases, such as ____ where the FTB takes what appears to be an unreasonably aggressive stance against nonresidents. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
     “PEPE THE FROG” TO GO TO TRIALA Californian federal judge has, on a complaint filed by Matt Furie, proceeded to direct the case of Copyright infringement of “Pepe the Frog”, allegedly against Alex Jones, owner of InfoWars, to go for trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:44 pm by Hayley Tsukayama
Augmenting the basic enforcement measures in the CCPA assures that Californians can enjoy the rights the law promises. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am by Eric Goldman
Gallagher: He think there may be issues that need to be clarified, but he wants to guard against undermining substantive rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Eric Goldman
This bill would prohibit discrimination against a consumer because the consumer exercised their rights under the bill. [read post]
AB 1661, which was passed in reaction to several sexual harassment cases against elected officials, is similar to 2004’s AB 1825, which required the same basic requirements for private employers. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:00 am
In some cases it will not only reduce your sentence but in many cases may even eliminate some if not all the charges against you. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
In some cases it will not only reduce your sentence but in many cases may even eliminate some if not all the charges against you. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:45 am by Dave Maass
The final tally for the Public's Right to Know Act was 61.5 percent for, 38.5 percent against—a landslide for transparency. [read post]