Search for: "CAMPBELL v. HOLDER" Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Despite the court’s punt on this issue, I believe the default position is that social media accounts are official accounts so long as the holder is in office. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Pumfrey J has previously said (in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell [2006] EWHC 2482 (Ch)) that a Vero notice is "a clear arguable threat" and granted an interim injunction on this basis.More recently, (in Cassie Creations v Blackmore and Mirrorkool [2014] EWHC2941 (Ch) and T&A Textiles and Hosiery Limited v Hala Textile UK Limited[2015] EWHC 2888) it was suggested that arguing that an eBay Vero notice may be a threat is persuasive. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Florian Mueller
I really like the following description of "transformative" use in the Supreme Court's Campbell ruling:"The central purpose of this investigation is to see, in Justice Story's words, whether the new work merely 'supersede[s] the objects' of the original creation, Folsom v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
From the iconic lithographic cans of Campbell's soup to the Marilyn Monroe, Andy Warhol's art is iconic and one that most (if not everyone) recognises. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
From the iconic lithographic cans of Campbell's soup to the Marilyn Monroe, Andy Warhol's art is iconic and one that most (if not everyone) recognises. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
S. ____ (2023) at page 12 citing Campbell v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am by WSLL
Langer of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming.Date of Decision: May 31, 2012Facts:  After the owner of a construction project in Campbell County defaulted on its obligations to various creditors, mortgage holder Pinnacle Bank foreclosed on the real property securing its mortgage. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
  For example, the copyright holder can also sue for copyright infringement, which could increase damages by as much as $150,000. [read post]