Search for: "CERTIFIED CAPITAL APPELLATE DEFENSE, All" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Trammell, 706 F.3d 1286 (10th Cir. 2013) (concurred in decision) “prisoner was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel during penalty phase of capital murder trial” Banks v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:19 am by MBettman
Lange, Bonezzi Switzer Polito & Hupp LPA, Cleveland, for Appellant Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital for Rehabilitation Donald Screen, The Chandra Law Firm LLC, Cleveland, for Appellee Gary Kirsch, Guardian for Jessica Jacobson Defense Arguments The three defense counsel divided their time, and all argued. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm by Jon
The territory that combines states and dominions shall be called the Commonwealth.3.2 Territories not organized into states, over which the Diet has exclusive legislative jurisdiction, without voting representation in the Diet, shall be called dominions.3.2.1 The Diet may establish one dominion with an area not to exceed 256 square kiloyards to serve at the Capital of the Union.3.3 The government of each state or subdivision thereof, shall have a written constitution, and shall be organized… [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm by Jon
Those active in militia may not be kept in a called up status beyond the duration of an emergency.4.6 A residentof a polity is an adult individual who is physically present om the soil of a polity, and who is thereby subject to the constitutional laws thereof.4.7 All persons while they are on the national soil of the Union, except for duly certified foreign diplomats, are subject to this Constitution and constitutional laws, and shall be deemed as having taken a oath or… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
The Court requested the records for all of the cases, and the records have arrived in all but one of them. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  *********************************************   Each year our Year in Review comments on significant securities-related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Law Lady
Attorney's fees -- Appellate fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Attorney's fees assessed against appellant and its counsel because of frivolous claim in initial brief that appellee's counsel made misleading statements to trial court at hearing on motion to dismissASPEN AIR CONDITIONING, INC., Appellant, vs. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
DeBruce, 14-807, is a state-on-top capital habeas case from the state that imposes more death sentences per capita than any other. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Or, if you didn’t see it at all, perplexing. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
(C.D.Cal., Sep. 22, 2014) also finding a common law performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings; and Capital Records, LLC v Sirius XM Radio, Inc (Sup.Ct.Cal. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Roper, 14-6873 (fourth relist), is a capital case asking (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Roper, 14-6873, a capital case that asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Chappell, 14-6264, a pro se petition in a capital case out of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Dukes a class of women managers could not be certified as a class because salary decisions were made locally by individual store supervisors. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
City of Philadelphia 13-324Issue: (1) Whether, in an ordinary civil case, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 gives a District Court carte blanche to raise, sua sponte, the affirmative defense of statute of limitations, where the defense was apparent on the face of the plaintiff’s complaint but the defendants had failed to plead it in their Answer and admitted to the Court that they had “missed it”; and (2) whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(c)(1),… [read post]