Search for: "CFS Enterprise, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:57 pm
Clay Jackson Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Already, some asset managers have expressed concern that the influx of shareholder proposals are not resulting in a corresponding increase in enterprise value.[28] Instead, these asset managers noted the proposals’ high level of prescriptiveness, lack of connection to material risks or long-term value, and decreased overall quality.[29] Thus, it is not surprising that the average percentage of votes cast “for” proposals declined from 36% in 2021 to 24% in 2023.[30]… [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
(here)At the center of Chinese overseas investment are their state owned and controlled enterprises. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm
See “Capital Data, Inc,” BizTimes, Sept 15, 2006. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., 116 Cal.App.4th 135 (2004); cf. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:01 pm
by Minnesota attorney Thomas James The rise in popularity of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) has generated considerable controversy and confusion about whether and how copyright law applies to them. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
The same can of course apply to any controversial business or enterprise, such as a church, synagogue, or mosque; an animal experimentation facility; a political organization; or a bookstore that sells books that contain the Mohammed cartoons or other material that highly offends some people.[2] A store is being robbed. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
The reason for our nonconformity is that “the United States has long sought to protect the property of its citizens abroad as part of a defense of America’s free enterprise system. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
I've just finished up a draft of this article; you can read the PDF, but here's an excerpt from the Introduction: For many litigants these days, one of the most important questions is: Can I keep my name, and its connection to the case and its facts, off the Internet? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Carlin Commc'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
A GOURMET POPCORN SHOP 6382190 GROUNDWORK 6376542 EXPRESS IS OUR MIDDLE NAME 6382166 HILLROM 6376491 VENICE GAZE 6376450 ARMSTOPIA 6376399 RELOADED 6376373 HSC STEPS SUCCESSION, TRANSITION & ESTATE PLANNING SOLUTIONS 6376352 ROYAL FEAST 6376321 CHARM AND ATTITUDE 6404965 K KEEPIT MOVING SAFETY & COMPLIANCE 6399819 CCS SAFESITE 6404690 XR OPTIC 6404676 GERM BUSTER 6399607 AMBASSADOR ENTERPRISES 6405415 6404568 GRILLED. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Churches, g., Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
