Search for: "CHARLES J. CUNNINGHAM" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:02 pm
Explaining individual-level hostilities in India’s Hindu–Muslim conflict Brandon Ives, Religious Institutionalism: A Domestic Explanation for External Support of Rebel Groups Research NoteZhanna Terechshenko, Charles Crabtree, Kristine Eck & Christopher J. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Cunningham, George Washington University, on Monday, January 9, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Corporate governance, Dodd-Frank Act, Institutional Investors, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder rights, State law Constitutionality of SEC’s Administrative Law Judges Headed to Supreme Court? [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts As we have, mentioned, on 13, 14 and 15 January 2016 Mann J heard a number of applications in phone hacking litigation against News Group Newspapers, Various v NGN. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Chanbonpin ProfChanbonpin John Marshall (Chicago) Anupam Chander AnupamChander UC Davis Guy-Uriel Charles ProfGuyCharles Duke Mary Cheh marycheh George Washington Jim Chen chenx064 Michigan State Miriam Cherry Prof_MCherry St. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Chanbonpin ProfChanbonpin John Marshall (Chicago) Anupam Chander AnupamChander UC Davis Guy-Uriel Charles ProfGuyCharles Duke Mary Cheh marycheh George Washington Jim Chen chenx064 Michigan State Miriam Cherry Prof_MCherry St. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]