Search for: "CHERRY v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
In the district court, a careful judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, who relied heavily upon animal studies and who cherry picked and distorted the available epidemiology.[9] The Court of Appeals reversed, in an unsigned, non-substantive opinion that interjected an asymmetric standard of review.[10] After granting review, the Supreme Court engaged with the substantive validity issues passed over by the intermediate appellate court. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:54 pm by Jim Walker
FBI obtains 2 search warrants in "suspicious death" of woman aboard @CarnivalCruise's Carnival Sunshine ship, for #cruise cabin & couple's car, searching for evidence of a crime https://t.co/Vthkc0Ruyx contradicts Carnival's belated claim of death due to "natural causes"— James (Jim) Walker (@CruiseLaw) March 9, 2023The search warrants were obtained from a Magistrate Molly Cherry in federal district court in Charleston, South Carolina (case… [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
The opportunity to field incoherent, inconsistent rationales for inclusions and exclusions that establish expert witness cherry picking will be lost without the face-to-face encounter allowed by oral examination. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm by Schachtman
Burst at *10, *12 cherry picked studies and failed to explain contrary results. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm by Schachtman
Clearly, there are some cases, like General Electric v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 3:27 am by Lyle Roberts
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 2014 WL 1910961 (1st Cir. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by Cormac Early
This blog’s other symposium, on Fisher v. [read post]