Search for: "CLARKE v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
A-23-882774-B, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
# # #USDOJ PRESS RELEASE ~ 09.29.23USA v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:32 am
In Clark v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:57 am
Although it remains to be seen whether other judges will revisit their position on Lusardi (the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals currently is deliberating on whether to do so in Clark v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:58 am
See Simon Clarke, Mitchell Riesenberger, Jose Rodriguez-Villalobos, Jeremy Seidman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Rev. 591 (2011) “Morrison v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:21 am
In the meantime, the Sixth Circuit heard oral argument on this same issue on December 7, 2022, in Clark v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
Not if it fails to provide objective criteria for a court to enforce material terms, according to the Albany County Commercial Division’s decision in Media Logic USA, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 11:34 am
(Pa. 1950); Clark v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
See e.g., Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
See Aromont USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:39 am
Sultanis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am
William Funk (Lewis & Clark), Ofer Raban (U. of Oregon), and Kyu Ho Youm (U. of Oregon); and bloggers Prof. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
