Search for: "CLASS PRODUCE GROUP, LLC v. E&C FOODS, INC., ET AL."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
AnchorPoint, Inc., et. al. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP) Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
SUPREME COURT IN HIAWATHA HENRY ET AL VS. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
(c) all counterclaims, cross-claims and third party claims; (d) all common law claims, based on contract, tort, fraud, or intentional torts; (e) all claims based on a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute or regulation; . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(China Law Blog) China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents (IAM) IP rights and Chinese producers: you live and die by the jump shot (IP finance) Copyright Administrative Punishment Implementation Rules (2009) (IP Dragon) Denmark Court finds no infringement in wine bottle battle: Udesen Danmark v Excellent Wine Danmark A/S (International Law Office) Europe ECJ rules on bad faith in chocolate bunnies case: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli (IPKat)… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Class 46) India Geographical indication protection for Tanjavur dolls (Spicy IP) Economic implications of copyright: the exhaustion principle (International Law Office) Extensions of copyrights? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(China Law Blog) China plans for 50% increase in number of patent agents (IAM) IP rights and Chinese producers: you live and die by the jump shot (IP finance) Copyright Administrative Punishment Implementation Rules (2009) (IP Dragon) Denmark Court finds no infringement in wine bottle battle: Udesen Danmark v Excellent Wine Danmark A/S (International Law Office) Europe ECJ rules on bad faith in chocolate bunnies case: Chocoladefabriken Lindt &… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Weiss & Ashley E. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) under the categorical exemptions set forth in California Code of Regulations, title 14, sections 15303, subdivision (a), and 15332, and that the “Significant Effects Exception” set forth in section 15300.2, subdivision (c), of the regulations did not operate to remove the project from the scope of those categorical exemptions? [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In one of a number of 'food' cases this year, A federal judge told a Cleveland restaurateur that food recipes can't be protected by copyright law: Judge Patricia A Gaughan said: "The identification of ingredients necessary for the preparation of food is a statement of facts. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
One frequently cited case in point is the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
