Search for: "COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 1:06 pm by Dave Wieneke
I’ve grown tired of hearing our times are unprecedented. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 8:50 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
On April 23, 2005, James Loar, an employee of Cooper Tire and Rubber Company, injured his back while at work. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Constitution.[3] A Pennsylvania statute, however, requires out-of-state companies that register to do business in Pennsylvania to consent to the Commonwealth’s exercise of general personal jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:23 am by Moll Law Group
In an ongoing investigation against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the company is in the hot seat for how it has handled the recall of a product it stopped manufacturing in 2003. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
Feb. 15, 2021), did not support extending the agency theory to an exculpation inquiry of an agreement beyond those persons who govern a partnership or limited liability company. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:47 am by Howard Wasserman
Another case, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
Evidently, the petitioner in Mallory (a railroad worker who wants to sue his employer in Pennsylvania) was successful in arguing that his case is a better vehicle for addressing the issue than Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 7:33 am by Alex Meier
Cooper Tire Takes an Outlier Position on Personal Jurisdiction In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by Jake Ward
Ward was also a Materials Chemist for several years at the Cooper Tire & Rubber Company in Findlay, Ohio, prior to starting his legal practice. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
This is largely derived from the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in General Tire v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1975] 2 All ER 173 – a patent case in which it was held that "[d]amages should be liberally assessed but.. the object is to compensate the plaintiffs and not punish the defendants".The court is looking for the royalty which "would have been arrived at in negotiations between the parties, had each been making reasonable use of… [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
(“GYPC”), as seller; the Third‐Party Defendants, as principals; Mindstream, as the buyer; and Eastport Holdings, LLC (“Eastport”) as the parent company of Mindstream. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
ISPs should not ignore clear indications of infringement however discovered & should cooperate w/copyright owners. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:19 pm by Tim K. Garrett
The NLRB’s invitation made reference to three Obama-era rulings, including the 2016 opinion in Cooper Tire & Rubber, which I criticized here. [read post]
., 360 NLRB 972 (2014); Pier Sixty, LLC, 362 NLRB 505 (2015); and Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 363 NLRB No. 194 (2016) to get a sense of the outrageous conduct the Board has recently found permissible under the Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:33 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
These piles of shredded rubber should be a reminder to Maryland truck drivers of the importance of properly maintaining the tires on their rig. [read post]