Search for: "COVIDIEN INC." Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 11:37 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Bard (now part of Beckton Dickinson), Covidien, and Atrium Medical Corp. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:15 am by Butch Laker
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying a request for declaratory judgment by Covidien LP and Covidien Holding Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:15 am by Butch Laker
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying a request for declaratory judgment by Covidien LP and Covidien Holding Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
In one, medical device company Covidien agreed to pay $13 million to resolve a False Claims Act lawsuit filed by Itri on behalf of her client, a former Covidien employee, who blew the whistle on a kickback scheme designed to defraud Medicare programs. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:56 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
In one, medical device company Covidien agreed to pay $13 million to resolve a False Claims Act lawsuit filed by Itri on behalf of her client, a former Covidien employee, who blew the whistle on a kickback scheme designed to defraud Medicare programs. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: Minnesota-based medical device manufacturer ev3 Inc. has agreed to plead guilty to charges related to its neurovascular medical device, Onyx Liquid Embolic System, and pay $17.9 million, the Department of Justice announced today. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 2:00 pm by Corbin Bridge
Medtronic’s acquisition of Covidien completed in January 2015 for $42.9 billion. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent No. 8,061,359, which is owned by Appellees Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Covidien LP (together, “S&N”). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:15 am by Joseph Root
Covidien, Inc., dealt with ultrasonicshears for cutting and sealing a blood vessel... [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Covidien LP, et al., No. 16-366 (separation-of-function – can the PTO Director delegate IPR institution decisions to PTAB); Same question presented in LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]