Search for: "COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC."
Results 161 - 180
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the Supreme Court to… [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
" Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
Federal Circuit: Foreign Application Not Priority in Interference When it Only “Envisions” Invention
16 Sep 2010, 9:55 am
Gen-Probe Inc., 323 F.3d 956, 968 (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:22 pm
Courts appear to be scrutinizing closely "disclosure only" settlements as part of a Delaware court’s independent duty to ensure that a settlement is fair and reasonable — e.g., the Chancery Court's 2005 opinion In re Cox Communications Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
She points to a lawsuit filed in December against companies that used Facebook’s ability to target younger workers—big-name companies, including Amazon.com, Inc.; Cox Media Group; Cox Communications, Inc.; and T-Mobile. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
She points to a lawsuit filed in December against companies that used Facebook’s ability to target younger workers—big-name companies, including Amazon.com, Inc.; Cox Media Group; Cox Communications, Inc.; and T-Mobile. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
She points to a lawsuit filed in December against companies that used Facebook’s ability to target younger workers—big-name companies, including Amazon.com, Inc.; Cox Media Group; Cox Communications, Inc.; and T-Mobile. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:51 am
MoranWeb-based Email Bombardment Campaign Does Not Amount to a Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- Pulte Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
Doe is a copyright infringement lawsuit where IO Group doing business as Titan Media believes that 45 people have made copies of its works through a service called eDonkey2000 through the internet service provider Cox Communications. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
That affects knowledge standard for secondary liability.Aws Shemmeri ImageRights International, Inc.: LiveJournal decision is a step in the right direction—scrutinize relationships ISPs have w/user communities. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
Cox Retirement Properties, Inc., 302 P.3d 789 (Okla. 2013). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Director, OWCP, et al.Court: U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-14468Opinion Date: June 27, 2013Judge: Cox Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Health Law, Labor & Employment Law U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
Charter Communications Inc., a St. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Cox had obtained a grand jury subpoena requiring Nixon to deliver to the district court tape recordings of various meetings with assistants. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am
In the appeal of the dispute between BMG and Cox Communications regarding Cox’s liability for its users’ alleged downloading of copyrighted material using Cox’s Internet service, the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument last year and a decision should come down this year. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:28 pm
---The attorneys at Sallah Astarita & Cox include veteran securities litigators and former SEC Enforcement Attorneys. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:44 pm
Properly winding down an employment relationship takes, time, negotiation and multiple communications. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:06 am
Cox Fibernet Va., Inc., 602 F.3d 1325, 1338 (Fed.Cir. 2010) (finding that references relating to telephonyand wireless communication were relevant to the Internetand network protocols because the “problem facing theinventors of the Network Patents was related to” theproblem faced by the prior art references). [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
June 13, 2000); Cox v. [read post]
