Search for: "CRAIG V. CONNOR"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
(April 28, 2024).Tabrez Ebrahim, Islamic Intellectual Property, (Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2024).Craig B. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Sandra Day O’Connor. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Robinson, Center for Health Decision Science; Craig Thornton, Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis; and W. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm
In Maryland v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Craig Dennis Feiser, Mary Margaret Giannini, Assistant General Counsel, Jon Robert Phillips, Jason Robert Teal, Gabriella Young, O^ce of General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendants-Appellees. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
The Tax Foundation respectfully submits comment on the state tax and revenue implications of the proposed tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 3:52 pm
" Nieves v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/1/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 10:30 pm
She has no plans to visit Craig, Colorado. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
On Monday 13th December the Court will hear Public Prosecutors Office of the Athens Court of Appeal v O’Connor (Northern Ireland). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Alt-Right, Greenblatt v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
In another case, Craig v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
As I’ve written previously on Lawfare, in that case: The court analyzed the law under the framework of intermediate scrutiny established under Craig v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
By contrast, the party briefs and many of the amicus briefs filed in support of Colorado Civil Rights Commission (CCRC) and Craig and Mullins, the couple for whom Phillips refused to bake a cake, stressed that motive did not matter: discrimination laws aimed at conduct. [read post]
