Search for: "CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Section (C)" Results 21 - 40 of 2,130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 12:22 pm by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
In a recent Massachusetts criminal threatening case, a man was charged with one count of threatening to perpetrate a crime under M.G.L. c. 275. section 2. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:33 pm
"The issue opens with an article by Northern District of Texas US Attorney Richard Roper and former Eastern District U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
Tomorrow I have 20 minute oral argument before the First District Court of Appeals, where I represent the Appellant in an appeal of his criminal conviction for one count of violating Penal Code section 182(a)(1) - conspiracy. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:53 am by Misty Edmundson
Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America, District Court of Oregon Cause no. 1:11-cv-03146-CL, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
HB 20 defines neither “impeding” nor “transmission,” but it is hard to imagine an interpretation that doesn’t conflict with the protections granted to these service providers by Section 230(c)(2)(A) and 230(c)(2)(B). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:32 am by Sarah Baumgartel
Section 3553(f) permits a district court to sentence a defendant below the otherwise applicable statutory mandatory minimum for federal drug offenses if the defendant meets certain criteria. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:52 am by Edward T. Kang
Reversing the district court’s decision to dismiss a RICO complaint, Judge Posner said the “complaint also alleges that the defendants acquired control of [the enterprise] by means of the fraud … this is a good allegation under section 1962(b),” as in Sutliff v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
Firstly, the Mostyn J judgment authorising the c-section. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:07 am
The Bankruptcy Court held in favor of the Bank, and the decision was affirmed by the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit (click here for Eleventh Circuit opinion). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:08 pm by Kurt J. Schafers
The court of appeals noted that the district court focused on the fact that Section 13(c) referred to actions that a "person" could file. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
The statement focuses on Section 230(c)(1), even though the question presented to the court solely addressed Section 230(c)(2)(B). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
The court uses a lengthy and unnecessary historical tour of the Seventh Circuit Section 230 jurisprudence to concludes that Section 230(c)(1) is just a definitional section (as Doe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:55 am by Jeanine Cali
Cheshire, chair of the Federal Bar Association’s Criminal Law Section, welcomed U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm by UChicagoLaw
After graduating from law school, he clerked for Chief Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and for Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm by UChicagoLaw
After graduating from law school, he clerked for Chief Judge Marilyn Hall Patel of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and for Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:31 am
At the detention hearing, the judge determines according to statute whether any "condition or combination of conditions set forth in subsection (c) of this section will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other person and the community." 18 USC 3142(b). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 11:53 am by Misty Edmundson
Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America, District Court of Oregon Cause no. 1:11-cv-03146-CL, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. [read post]
Most criminal court judges are inclined to reduce a prior felony conviction if the defendant has successfully completed probation. [read post]