Search for: "CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Section (C)" Results 141 - 160 of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2014, 10:27 am
  Over the Defendant’s objection, the District Court applied both.The Court ruled that the §2C1.1(c)(1) was properly applied. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 10:41 am
  We do not understand Congress's intent in enacting section 3553(c)(2) to have been to divert district courts' attention from conducting a thoughtful, on-the-record, face-to-face sentencing exchange with criminal defendants to obsessing over the inclusion of every material sentencing fact in a written order of judgment. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by Evan Lee
The usual rule in federal court is that district judges have discretion to run multiple sentences either concurrently or consecutively. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 4:08 am
If you lose there - THEN that order can be appealed again to the district court and then the Colorado Court's of Appeal. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Fitzgerald—in a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 7:08 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The district court imposed a sentence that was within the reasonable range of federal criminal sentences warranted by the facts. [read post]
Two doctors joined two parents on behalf of their minor children to file a complaint Tuesday in federal court against the governor and the district attorneys of Alabama, Shelby County, and Jefferson County, to block Alabama’s Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act (“VCCPA”) from going into effect on May 8, 2022. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, [www.abanet.org] VAN DE KAMP, JOHN, ET AL. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
By contrast, the full Supreme Court has never construed Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.Inconsistency aside, the Court should grant expedited review in both cases. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether employees in Asda’s retail operations are entitled to compare themselves with employees in the distribution centres so that they can rely on section 79(4)(c) of the Equality Act 2010 or, as regards the period covered by the Equal Pay Act 1970, so that they are in the “same employment” as defined in section 1(6) of the 1970 Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
A federal district court in Washington agreed and dismissed the obstruction charges. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am by Shea Denning
A superior court judge reviewed the file and ordered the district attorney’s office to disclose to defendant and/or defense counsel the contents of the investigative file in any criminal matter in which the State intended to call the officer as a witness. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:10 pm by Aurora Barnes
This week we highlight petitions pending before the Supreme Court that address the validity of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure Section 1207.04, under what circumstances a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
An expunction order is a Court order signed by a District Judge and sent to any "entity" that has information about the criminal record you seek to expunge. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 1:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Queens Sex Crimes Lawyer said that, the People move to have this Court reconsider its April 24, 1998 classification of the defendant for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6-C, Section 168 et seq., hereinafter "SORA"). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm by Law Lady
The district court denied the motion to reconsider because the case had been remanded to state court and was no longer pending in federal court. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:14 am
The Appellate Division directed the district to hold a new hearing.The court’s rationale would probably be applied in disciplinary actions taken against an individual pursuant to Section 75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:42 am by David DePaolo
The statute further provides that a judge of compensation claims cannot approve any other payment arrangement, and Section 440.105(3)(c) criminalizes an attorney's receipt of any payment that has not been approved by a JCC.Many states have similar statutes or regulations limiting fees for attorneys representing injured workers in litigation. [read post]