Search for: "CRST Van Expedited, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 5:40 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., unanimously ruling in favor of the employer. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:51 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Case No. 18-1446 (8th Cir. 2019). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:51 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Case No. 18-1446 (8th Cir. 2019). [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 6:34 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Case No. 07-CV-95, 2013 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:13 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:30 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., 679 F.3d 657 (8th Cir. 2012). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:29 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:54 am
But the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's sexual harassment lawsuit against Cedar Rapids, Iowa-based CRST Van Expedited Inc., has backfired and put the agency on trial, the Associated Press reports. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:54 pm
“Common sense undermines the notion that a defendant cannot ‘prevail’ unless the relevant disposition is on the merits,” the Court observed, noting that plaintiffs and defendants come to court with different objectives and that a defendant has fulfilled its primary objective whenever the plaintiff’s challenge is rebuffed, irrespective of the precise reason for the court’s decision (CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:26 am
“Common sense undermines the notion that a defendant cannot ‘prevail’ unless the relevant disposition is on the merits,” the Court observed, noting that plaintiffs and defendants come to court with different objectives and that a defendant has fulfilled its primary objective whenever the plaintiff’s challenge is rebuffed, irrespective of the precise reason for the court’s decision (CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court's 2016 decision in CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:53 pm
As previously reported by The National Law Journal, the EEOC’s suit against trucking giant CRST Van Expedited Inc. involved graphic allegations of sexual harassment by more than 200 newly hired women truckers on long-haul drives with men who were supposed to be training them. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:04 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
Although Buckhannon strongly favor’s the patentee in this case, it is not the only Supreme Court case on the topic — and conflicts fairly directly with the Supreme Court’s later decision in CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Defendant.No. 07-CV-95-LRR.Feb. 9, 2010.ORDERLINDA R. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:02 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Aug. 1, 2019, U.S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:39 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc., Case Nos. 09-3764, 09-3765 & 10-1682 (8th Cir. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:10 am
” By comparison, the lower court judge in the Eighth Circuit sexual harassment case against trucking giant CRST Van Expedited Inc. conceded that “dozens of potentially meritorious sexual harassment claims may now never see the inside of the courtroom” when she threw out the EEOC’s case for failing to fulfill the administrative prerequisites. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
On Monday the Court also heard oral arguments in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
