Search for: "CT Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 3,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
The proposed bill would "revise the corporate governance provisions [of the Connecticut Statutes] applicable to the Roman Catholic Church. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:15 am by David Lynn
CT Corporation recently sent an alert to customers noting that the State of California is planning to launch an enhanced business entity system on Tuesday, March 29, 2022. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: The Washington Legal Foundation previews next week’s oral arguments in CTS Corporation v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:42 pm by Margaret Grisdela
Partner rates increased an average of 8.6% while mid-level and senior associate rates went up over 11% from 2007-2009, according to a Wall Street Journal blog article on a new survey by CT TyMetrix and the Corporate Executive Board. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:28 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Masley in Culligan Soft Water Co. v Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC, 2020 NY Slip Op 30828(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Mar. 19, 2020]. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL OFFICE TOWER IN HOUSTON Relators Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
" (Moeller IP) - 11:00 am to 11:45 am (CT) September 10, 2021 - Supreme Court IP Review (SCIPR) conference (Chicago-Kent College of Law) - noon to 1:15 pm (CT) September 13-14, 2021 - National Forum on Paragraph IV Litigation (Momentum Events) September 17, 2021 - "IP and Tech Corporate Counsel Conference" (Center for Intellectual Property, Information & Privacy Law at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law) - 7:30 am to 4:15 pm on September… [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:05 pm
In so holding, the court reasoned that corporate documents belong to the corporation itself, and not to its former employee. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Sarah Freuden, Alex Zerden
Ct. 1659 (2013) (Kiobel II), the panel held that it does not, and therefore affirmed the district court’s dismissal of these claims against the Arab Bank. [read post]