Search for: "CT Corporation" Results 141 - 160 of 3,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2010, 6:05 pm
In so holding, the court reasoned that corporate documents belong to the corporation itself, and not to its former employee. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Sarah Freuden, Alex Zerden
Ct. 1659 (2013) (Kiobel II), the panel held that it does not, and therefore affirmed the district court’s dismissal of these claims against the Arab Bank. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 2:11 pm
Ct. at 1746 (citing U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:39 am by R. David Donoghue
The Corporate Committee of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago (“IPLAC”) is hosting a fireside chat with Patent Office Director Andrei Iancu on January 16, 2020 from 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm CT. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:45 pm by Patent Docs
Goodstein of Mayer Brown, Shane Hanna of Parsons Behle & Latimer, Dan Lias of CT Corporation, and Bart D. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:28 am by Susanna Leighton
United States Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) has written a letter urging the U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Pershia Wilkins
NYS Bar Association – Corporate Counsel Section The following Summer 2014 Kenneth G. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
First, citing Business Corporation Law § 508 and the Second Department’s decision in Essig v 5670 58 St. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
  But what if a corporation was suspended (or only found out it was suspended) the day before the notice of appeal was due? [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:08 am by Robby Sanoff
Even Superfund lawyers are likely to find the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in CTS Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by PaulKostro
” The applicable statute states: For the purposes of this [A]ct, the officers of a corporation and any agents having the management of such corporation shall be deemed to be the employers of the employees of the corporation. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:01 pm
If this case had come out any other way, I'd have fallen on the floor in disbelief.The Court of Appeal holds that when a corporation (or corporations) own a shopping center and the economy turns south, that does not constitute "reasonable cause and circumstances beyond [their] control" for not timely paying property taxes. [read post]