Search for: "California Interstate Telephone Company" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2021, 12:29 pm by FHH Law
If you have any questions about whether your company must file Form 477 or what information your company is required to submit in the filing, you should contact your telecommunications counsel. [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:29 pm by FHH Law
If you have any questions about whether your company must file Form 477 or what information your company is required to submit in the filing, you should contact your telecommunications counsel. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Kevin Kaufman
” Wireless carriers are required to pay this surcharge on all charges for interstate telephone service. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:50 am by FHH Law
Numbering Resource Utilization/ Forecast Reporting – All telecommunications carriers receiving telephone numbers from the North American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA), a pooling administrator, or another telecommunications carrier must report their current telephone number holdings. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm by Jordan Brunner, Emma Kohse
Maryland, whose dialed numbers were communicated to the telephone company and then collected by the government by way of a pen register, Carpenter and Sanders must have known that phone companies receive (and record) the type of information collected by the police here. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Rptr. 730, 739 (Cal. 2006) ("On its face, application of the California law here at issue would affect only a business's undisclosed recording of telephone conversations with clients or consumers in California and would not compel any action or conduct of the business with regard to conversations with non-California clients or consumers. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:41 am by FHH Law
If you have any questions about whether your company must file Form 477 or what information your company is required to submit in the filing, you should contact your telecommunications counsel. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:24 am by Colby Pastre
California and Wyoming lowered the rates of their state USF surcharges. [read post]
” Telemarketing is defined as “a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to induce the purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution, by use of one or more telephones and which involves more than one interstate telephone call. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Note: Federal includes 3% federal excise tax (until 5/2006) and federal universal service fund charge, which is set by the FCC and varies quarterly: Federal USF 7/1/2018 — 37.1% Interstate safe harbor x 17.9% contribution factor = 6.34% effective tax rate  http://www.usac.org/cont/tools/contribution-factors.aspx Source: Methodology derived from Committee on State Taxation, “50-State Study and Report on Telecommunications Taxation,” May 2005. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:57 am by Venkat
" The court could not find any discriminatory effect on interstate commerce, since the statute prohibits internet gambling "evenhandedly, regardless of whether the company running the web site is located in or outside the state of Washington. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm by Christa Culver
Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Docket: 10-329Issue(s): (1) Whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies competitive rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC's interpretation of its… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
FUSF charge as of July 1, 2020 is calculated by 37.1 percent interstate safe harbor times 26.5 percent contribution factor, which equals a 9.83 percent effective tax rate, http://www.usac.org/cont/tools/contribution-factors.aspx. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm by Mandelman
Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010 – Requires each federal and state court to recognize any lawful notarization occurring in or affecting interstate commerce which is made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a state other than the state where the court is located. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 1:55 am by Kyle Hulehan
As data makes up a greater portion of our wireless consumption every year, services and products offered by wireless companies have adapted. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
As a result, consumers and businesses who purchase interstate telecommunications services pay very high surcharge rates. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am by David Urban
 For California, the issue is not limited to public institutions like community colleges, the University of California, and California State University. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by FHH Law
If you have any questions about whether your company must file Form 477 or what information your company is required to submit in the filing, you should contact your telecommunications counsel. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Ad Law Defense
The food industry went into an uproar over Vermont’s law because – given the realities of interstate commerce – companies would have to change their labeling nationwide to satisfy the demands of Vermont. [read post]