Search for: "California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2014, 8:56 am
Appeals Board, filed on July 3, 2014, the supreme court held that a good faith refusal to sign a disciplinary notice is not a misconduct within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:11 pm
"Although the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board is supposed to decide within 30 days whether the state wrongly denied an individual's jobless benefits, less than 4% of complaints are finished by then, the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:06 am
In the recent decision of Natkin v California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, the appellate court clarified the term "wages" within the meaning of unemployment benefits rules. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Appeals Board, filed on July 3, 2014, the supreme court held that a good faith refusal to sign a disciplinary notice is not a misconduct within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 9:45 am by Steven G. Pearl
Su (7/19/13) --- Cal.App.4th --- (discussed here), the Court of Appeal found that a determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board that cosmetologists were independent contractors barred the Labor Commissioner from finding that they were employees. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 am by Arkady Itkin
Appeals Board, filed on July 3, 2014, the supreme court held that a good faith refusal to sign a disciplinary notice is not a misconduct within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm by AALRR
  On appeal, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision in favor of Paratransit and against the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:51 pm
The California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (CUIAB) reversed the EDD's determination, finding that the evidence of record established that the claimant did not commit any of the acts of misconduct for which the employer discharged her. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by vforberger
So, California is already allowing benefits under its own definitions and application of what able and available means. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:19 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Reviewing Board found that the California unemployment compensation disability benefits were paid pursuant to the state’s Unemployment Insurance Code, which is part of a comprehensive program of social insurance. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, even though the employer was within its rights to fire him for insubordination, his single act of disobedience did not constitute misconduct disqualifying him from receiving unemployment compensation benefits (Paratransit, Inc v Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, July 3, 2014, Baxter, M). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The Employment Development Department (EDD) issues employer account numbers (sometimes called state employer identification numbers, SEINs, state ID numbers, or reserve account numbers) and administers California's payroll taxes, including State Disability Insurance, Employment Training Tax, Unemployment Insurance, and California Personal Income Tax withholding. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
There are arrows in the quiver of the Appeals Board to deter the type of conduct reflected both in the ERISA preemption argument as well as employee “leasing agencies. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:45 am by Cyrus Farivar
Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images) New York City’s largest taxi driver advocacy group is hailing a legal decision by the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which ruled last Friday that three out-of-work Uber drivers can be considered employees for the purpose of unemployment benefits. [read post]