Search for: "Card v. State of Michigan" Results 81 - 100 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bexis
  Bexis participated as amicus curiae in the Michigan case (Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:17 pm by Cannabis Law Group
But then some states (namely, Michigan) defied this too by allowing CBD be offered in alcoholic drinks. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am by Bruce M. Robinson
However, the Supreme Court modified its position in the decision of Michigan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Next up is Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am by Lorene Park
In another example, a Michigan federal court dismissed an employee’s FMLA claim because Michigan does not recognize same-sex marriage and her claim was based on her employer’s failure to approve leave to care for her same-sex partner who had brain cancer (Copeland v Mid-Michigan Regional Medical Center, ED Mich 2012). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  [Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
In fact, the two vendors deployed most prominently in the United States, Voatz and Democracy Live, have been subject to scathing assessments by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of Michigan researchers, who found a slew of basic security and privacy flaws that could allow concerted adversaries to reveal, alter or deny a voter’s ballot. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
These retaliation claims are apparently among those that a Michigan federal district court permitted plaintiff to continue to pursue.In Adkins v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm by Lorene Park
The federal court noted that the employee handbook strictly prohibited the “illegal use, sale, or possession of narcotics, drugs, or controlled substances while on the job or on Company property,” and despite the employee’s state medical marijuana card and license, marijuana remains illegal under federal law (Henry v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Alex Hunt
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]