Search for: "Carter v. United States of America"
Results 21 - 40
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2022, 10:02 am
Much like the United States, European leaders believed that deregulation would reduce the cost of air travel and increase competition among airlines. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
Baroness Jay of Paddington asked Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they had made of recent legislation on assisted dying in North America; and whether those laws provide an appropriate basis for legislation in England and Wales. (9 March 2017). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
United States Smartmatic, [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Additional Information: Carter, Cecile Elkins. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:20 am
Though the Carter administration signed CEDAW in 1980, the Bush and Reagan administrations opposed it and despite repeated hearings and recommendations from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for its ratification, the United States is still not a party to the Convention. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Article II, Section 1 says that “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Michael Flynn recently seemed to call for a military coup in the United States, Myanmar-style. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
” The anchor declared that the attackers had earned “the evil distinction of having perpetrated a criminal outrage almost unique in America’s history. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a… [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
Neither of her parents attended college: Her father, Nathan, came to the United States from Russia as a teenager and worked as a furrier; her mother, Celia Amster Bader, was born a few months after her parents arrived in the country from Austria and worked in a garment factory to put her brother through college. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In fact, in almost two of every three households in America with dependents, both parents work to make ends meet.[3] Combine this statistic with the reality that the tax code treats married couples who file jointly as a singular tax unit. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
There are the usual exemptions, as well as others not usually specified, including people just passing through the province to elsewhere, although they must stop only for necessary reasons (also see a similar provision for people transiting through the NWT to Nunavut for less than 12 hours and for non Yukon residents travelling to a neighbouring jurisdiction, allowed a maximum 24 hours), “a family unit of parents and children, to facilitate shared custody of children as per a court… [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am
United States, Justice Gorsuch issued a 33 page manifesto, cast as a dissenting opinion, dismissing Scalia’s deferential perspective as a “blank check” to federal bureaucrats. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Should the rules of constitutional amendment in Article V be interpreted strictly, even if this legalistic interpretation holds back the realization of equality embedded in the formative texts of the United States, including the Declaration of Independence, the Reconstruction Dismerberments, and the many franchise-expanding constitutional changes since then? [read post]
