Search for: "Cartier"
Results 61 - 80
of 916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 12:47 am
Never Too Late 198 [Week ending 17 June] BREAKING: CJEU rules that Louboutin red sole mark does NOT fall within absolute ground for refusal | The Broad's CRISPR patent: The curious case of the missing declaration | Kymouse's stay of execution | The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP summer events | BREAKING: UK Supreme Court rules that ISPs do NOT have to pay implementation costs in Cartier case | who should control the 1500-year old monastery manuscript of the Garima Gospels?… [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
Never Too Late 198 BREAKING: CJEU rules that Louboutin red sole mark does NOT fall within absolute ground for refusal | The Broad's CRISPR patent: The curious case of the missing declaration | Kymouse's stay of execution | The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP summer events | BREAKING: UK Supreme Court rules that ISPs do NOT have to pay implementation costs in Cartier case | who should control the 1500-year old monastery manuscript of the Garima Gospels? [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
Never Too Late 198 BREAKING: CJEU rules that Louboutin red sole mark does NOT fall within absolute ground for refusal | The Broad's CRISPR patent: The curious case of the missing declaration | Kymouse's stay of execution | The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP summer events | BREAKING: UK Supreme Court rules that ISPs do NOT have to pay implementation costs in Cartier case | who should control the 1500-year old monastery manuscript of the Garima Gospels? [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 5:00 am
According to investigators, the pair made purchases at Cartier, Chanel, Hermes, Louis Vuitton, Tiffany and Van Cleef & Arpels. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
Author: Rose HughesPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 198 BREAKING: CJEU rules that Louboutin red sole mark does NOT fall within absolute ground for refusal | The Broad's CRISPR patent: The curious case of the missing declaration | Kymouse's stay of execution | The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP summer events | BREAKING: UK Supreme Court rules that ISPs do NOT have to pay implementation costs in Cartier case | who should control the… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:18 pm
Evolución Jurídica de la Doctrina de la Responsabilidad del Superior Jerárquico: De Yamashita a Bemba Gombo en la Corte Penal Internacional Sección de Artículos de Investigación desde otras áreas de las Ciencias Humanas y SocialesHector Olasolo, Éric Lair, & Lucia Carcano, Justicia, (des)orden y grupos al margen de la ley: Miradas cruzadas sobre Brasil, México y Colombia Sección de Ensayos de Investigación… [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 12:53 am
As regards the issue of costs, in the Milan case, the reasoning (albeit in the context of interim proceedings) appears substantially similar with the most recent approach in the UK, as envisaged by the Supreme Court in Cartier [here]. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
As the black-and-white photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson once said to the color photographer William Eggleston: 'You know, William, color is bullshit.'... [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
UKSC JUDGMENT IN CARTIER – WHO PAYS FOR WEBSITE BLOCKING ORDERS? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:50 pm
Customs and Border Protection, July 30, 2018https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/cbp-seizes-over-2-million-worth-counterfeit-cartier-love-bracelets [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
Cearta.ie considers the implications of cases involving blocking injunctions resulting from the Sony v UPC and Cartier v BT case. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 3:19 am
Supreme Court Author Christine SmithLicence Creative Commons attribution share alike 4.0 internationalSource Wikipedia Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lords Mance, Kerr, Sumption, Mance and Hodge) Cartier International AG and others v British Telecommunications Plc and another [2018] 1 WLR 3259, [2018] WLR 3259, [2018] WLR (D) 354, [2018] UKSC 28 What this [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
EventsAmeriKat provides a round-up of the must-attend IP events of the summer: The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP summer events.Ready for the summer social calendarCopyrightKat Eleonora Rosati reported on UK Supreme Court ruling that the ISPs (internet access providers) in a case do not have to bear the costs of implementation of blocking injunction issued against them pursuant to section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA), requiring them to block access to a… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
Throughout its lifespan, Cartier has been a test case. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Supreme Court has handed down a decision in the Cartier case finding that internet service providers (“ISP’s”) do not have to bear the costs of implementing a blocking injunction pursuant to section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, the statue requires ISP’s to block access to sites which sell goods that infringe upon trade mark rights. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
MPs at #copyrightreview are told by @GFHenderson of @Music_Canada “Governments around the… 2018-06-14 Legal basis for blocking orders is equitable protective jurisdiction Cartier International v British Telecommunica… https://t.co/tEo02gW0x2 2018-06-14 Developments in computer, Internet and e-commerce law: the year in review (2017-2018) https://t.co/vOtFulGTIO 2018-06-14 Graham Henderson on copyright reform ParlVu https://t.co/vlWiqNPCiw 2018-06-14 Developments in… [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
Rights holders must pay costs for blocking Orders Cartier International v British Telecommunications [2018] UKSC… https://t.co/PYWPA8FxDw 2018-06-14 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-06-13 https://t.co/FF6COeNMof 2018-06-14 RT @hollyanndoan: There was no “mistake” in 2012. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
John Doe, 2017 FCA 97 Cartier International AG & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2018] UKSC 28 (13 June 2018) Union Des Associations Européennes De Football v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors [2017] EWHC 3414 (Ch) (21 December 2017) My “Year in review” presentations to the Toronto Computer Lawyers Group for prior years are available at this site. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:53 am
Overturning the decisions at first instance [IPKat report here and here] and on appeal [IPKat report here], this morning the UK Supreme Court has ruled that the ISPs (internet access providers) do NOT have to bear the costs of implementation of the injunction (in this case, a blocking injunction) issued against them pursuant to section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA), requiring them to block access to a number of websites making available for sale goods infringing… [read post]
