Search for: "Case Pro Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 4,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2020, 2:47 pm by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Veeco Instruments Inc.), and COVID-19 has drastically decreased courts’ ability to get civil cases to trial. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected a challenge by a non-profit, non-religious pro-life group to the scope of the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:00 pm
Barriers to Pro Bono involvement Models of Pro Bono involvement Law student involvement in unemployment insurance benefits cases How can we best use the resources that we currently have? [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:59 am by Walter Olson
I explore the case of Capital Associated Industries Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 7:47 am by Trista W. McConnell
  This distinguished All Sons’ situation from that presented in the case relied on by the owner, wherein the contractor failed to do anything within the one year period (see Aztec Window & Door Mfg., Inc. v. 71 Vill. [read post]
25 May 2016, 7:47 am by Trista W. McConnell
  This distinguished All Sons’ situation from that presented in the case relied on by the owner, wherein the contractor failed to do anything within the one year period (see Aztec Window & Door Mfg., Inc. v. 71 Vill. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:54 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Franchisor Counsel: For Tim Hortons USA, Inc., Defendant: Michael D Joblove, LEAD ATTORNEY, Aaron Seth Blynn, Genovese Joblove & Battista, Miami, FL; Adam Acosta, John Mark Gidley, PRO HAC VICE, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 9:36 am by Bill Marler
  In an October 8 press release, the health department, following its investigation into those cases of liver failure and acute hepatitis, requested that retailers remove OxyElite Pro from store shelves. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Thereafter, the court granted appellants’ motion to intervene nunc pro tunc in the case, and the Virginia Supreme Court dismissed their mandamus and prohibition petitions and, finding no reversible error, denied their petition for appeal from the closure order. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm by Edward M. McNally
DSL.net Inc., C.A. 2823-VCN (April 29, 2010) In this unusual case filed by a pro se litigant, the Court extended Revlon duties to when a company issues convertible notes that will change control of the company upon conversion. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The PTO bears the initial burden of showing a prima facie case of obviousness. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Sometimes an inexperienced practitioner, or a pro-se litigant who is trying to save $ 175 might start the case in Civil Court rather than Supreme, and sometimes a judge will transfer the case pursuant to CPLR 325d rather than handle it (or sometimes to punish plaintiff's attorney.) [read post]