Search for: "Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al v. Attorney General of California et al" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that prohibited California from enforcing AB 51, which was signed into law in 2019 (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
In 2021, a Ninth Circuit three-justice panel held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) didn’t preempt AB 51, and thus California could enforce its prohibition on mandatory employment arbitration agreements (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Mukasey, Attorney General, et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Symczyk (Granted )Docket: 11-1059Issue(s): Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense BarMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Symczyk (Granted )Docket: 11-1059Issue(s): Whether a case becomes moot, and thus beyond the judicial power of Article III, when the lone plaintiff receives an offer from the defendants to satisfy all of the plaintiff's claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense BarMotion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
Brief in opposition of respondents California Pharmacists Association et al. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of ARC of DallasAmicus brief of Cato InstituteAmicus brief of United States Attorneys General et al.Amicus brief of American Center for Law and JusticeAmicus brief of Gathie Barnett Edmonds and Marie Barnett SnodgrassAmicus brief of National Legal FoundationReply of petitioners ________________________________________________________________ The following petitions have been re-listed for the… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
SteenDocket: 10-671Issue(s): Whether the Twenty-first Amendment overrides the Commerce Clause and allows States to discriminate against out-of-state businesses in the sale of a [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Obama attorney-general pick good news for IP, says US Chamber of Commerce (IAM) ‘The future of the patent system’ features four former PTO leaders (Hal Wegner) CAFC to hear oral argument in USPTO v GSK & Tafas 5 December (Anticipate This!) [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper)   US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision… [read post]