Search for: "Channel Well Technology Co. Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
But L-1, which should be simpler to obtain,” said Chen Amit, co-founder and CEO of Tipalti, a San Mateo, Calif. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
” That case is Kroger Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has published a report which concludes that social media companies must be subject to a legal duty of care to help protect young people’s health and well-being when accessing their sites. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:24 am
On July 19, days ahead of its IPO on the Nasdaq, PDD was sued by a Chinese diaper manufacturer, Beijing Daddy's Choice Science and Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
Dale Cohen, the clinic’s founder and director, is special counsel to the PBS channel’s documentary series “Frontline” and co-author of “Media and the Law. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:35 am
China’s Sanpower Group Co., Ltd. acquired Dendreon Pharmaceuticals Inc for $0.8 billion, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. acquired Tolero Pharmaceuticals Inc. for $0.8 billion to assist Sumitomo to refresh its pipeline.[28] In Q4 2017, a few M&A transactions have occurred in the pharma deal market. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm
These definitions for both newspaper and broadcasting were last amended in 1980, well before the advent of a new technology that would require further interpretation. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
”—In Vizant Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
”—In Vizant Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:38 pm
Hengshui Ziyahe Construction Co., Ltd., the Chinese Supreme Court alluded to the availability of SEP-based injunctive relief. [read post]
Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta
21 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm
In 1917 the Court decided in Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
On 17 July 2014, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Building Register Ltd v Mark Weston ([2014] EWHC 2361 (QB)). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
In Eisai Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Irrelevant, said the Board: "It is well-established ... that we are bound by the identification as written in the registration and cannot limit registrant’s goods, channels of trade, or classes of customers to what any evidence shows them to be." [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:27 am
Commonly found in the case of cutting-edge products and technologies and often expensive, this model allows the foreign company to get close to the customer base and have greater control of how the cust [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:53 pm
While the go or no-go decision criteria for selling through offshore channels may be less demanding than calculating the return on investment through a direct presence, several factors should still be carefully considered. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:53 pm
Commonly found in the case of cutting-edge products and technologies and o [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:17 am
The case is HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat). [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:21 pm
By way of background, the investigation is based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) alleging violation of Section 337 by Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
