Search for: "Chantell Sackett"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Background Idaho landowners Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased property near Priest Lake, Idaho, and began backfilling the lot with dirt to prepare for building a home. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
(Tori Madden) In recent years, property rights disputes have made headlines at the court — notably last year’s dispute between Idaho homeowners Michael and Chantell Sackett and the EPA, in which the justices sided with the property owners and curtailed the Clean Water Act’s protections for wetlands. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In 2004, petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, seeking to build a home. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
EPA dates back to 2007, when plaintiffs Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their property with dirt and rock, about 300 feet from Priest Lake. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
EPA dates back to 2007, when plaintiffs Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their property with dirt and rock, about 300 feet from Priest Lake. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
EPA dates back to 2007, when plaintiffs Michael and Chantell Sackett began backfilling their property with dirt and rock, about 300 feet from Priest Lake. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm
Alito opened by explaining the origins of the dispute between the Sacketts and EPA as follows: “Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased property near Priest Lake, Idaho, and began backfilling the lot with dirt to prepare for building a home. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
The ruling was a setback for the Environmental Protection Agency and a victory for an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, who have been battling with the federal government for over 15 years in their efforts to build a house on an empty lot near a large lake. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Chantell and Michael Sackett bought a building lot in a Priest Lake, ID. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett are challenging a compliance order they received from the EPA after the purchase of a small parcel of land in Idaho that interfered with what at the time was classified as protectable waters. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
The present case was brought by Chantell and Michael Sackett, who purchased a residential lot near Idaho’s Priest Lake in 2004. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:47 am
” The plaintiffs in the case, Michael and Chantell Sackett, want to construct a house on an undeveloped lot that is 300 feet from Priest Lake, a large lake near the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
In 2004, Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased an undeveloped lot 300 feet from Priest Lake, a large lake near the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The issues are being heard through the case of Chantell and Mike Sackett of Priest Lake, ID. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm
It said: “Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett own a vacant lot in a mostly built-out residential subdivision near Priest Lake, Idaho. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:15 am
The justices also agreed to hear the case of an Idaho couple, Michael and Chantell Sackett, for the second time. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:47 am
Michael and Chantell Sackett purchased a small lot upon which they planned to build a house. [read post]
The Sacketts Got Their Day in Court on the Merits; Another Lesson in Being Careful What You Wish For
26 Aug 2021, 2:39 pm
Last week, in what may or may not be the last round in the ongoing efforts by Michael and Chantell Sackett to build a house on wetlands in Idaho, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that: EPA reasonably determined that the Sacketts’ property contains wetlands that share a significant nexus with Priest Lake, such that the lot was regulable under the CWA and the relevant regulations. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm
Chantell and Michael Sackett bought a residential lot in Bonner County, Idaho over fifteen years ago. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 12:26 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the Idaho property of Michael and Chantell Sackett was a regulated wetlands under the then-controlling 1977 EPA rules defining “waters of the United States,” and that the Sacketts dredging and filling of their property was subject to regulation by the U.S. [read post]
