Search for: "Charles Gould" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by William B. Gould IV
Here, labor law expert William Gould IV discusses challenges to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) vaccine mandates—and trends in the American labor market during the pandemic. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am by mes286
USC Gould School of Law – Shahzeen Attari, Associate Professor, Indiana University Paul H. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:19 pm by Dan Ernst
The schedule is out for NYU’s Legal History Colloquium:September 13Daniel Hulsebosch, Charles Seligson Professor of Law, NYU School of Law"Being Seen Like a State: The Constitution and Its International Audiences at the Founding"September 27Robert Reinstein, Clifford Scott Green Professor of Law, Temple Law School"Executive Power and the Law of Nations in the Washington Administration"October 11 Peter Onuf, Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation Professor, University… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Zietlow, Visiting Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School, 2019-2020, and the Charles W. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:35 am by Carter Wood
Sarelson, FL How to Identify the FLSA Case: Common Fact Patterns and Case Types -- Charles Lance Gould, AL Cruise Ship Injuries and Actions: What You Need to Know -- John H. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Doug Cornelius
Gould in Pillsbury’s Investment Fund Law Blog For fund managers and investment advisers, there are a number of takeaways from the D’Amato case. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Doug Cornelius
Gould in Pillsbury’s Investment Fund Law Blog For fund managers and investment advisers, there are a number of takeaways from the D’Amato case. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:03 am by Matthew Guariglia
Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Austin Gould of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Joseph DiPietro of the Secret Service, and Charles Romine from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) argued that face recognition and biometric surveillance is safe, regulated, and essential for the purposes of keeping airports and U.S. borders secure. [read post]