Search for: "Chartis Claims, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
In court documents filed in New York, AIG claims the insurance policy held by Disney insured the ABC defendants but excluded coverage for any claims alleging any malicious act, error or omission. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Wisely, the policies have carve-backs of coverage for claim expenses up to the point of an adverse adjudication, arbitral award, etc. adverse to the insured. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(iv) A claim filed with an agent of an insurer shall be deemed to have been filed with the insurer unless, consistent with law or contract, the agent notifies the person filing the claim that the agent is not authorized to receive notices of claim. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(iv) A claim filed with an agent of an insurer shall be deemed to have been filed with the insurer unless, consistent with law or contract, the agent notifies the person filing the claim that the agent is not authorized to receive notices of claim. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm by Law Lady
BROADVIEW ASSISTED LIVING and CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., Appellees. 1st District.Criminal Acts: SANDUSKY'S HOMEOWNERS POLICY DOESN'T COVER SEX-ABUSE DEFENSE COSTS, INSURER SAYS, State Farm v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Judge Tauro followed Judge Parker’s excellent decision in Kahn Lucas Lancaster Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:23 am by brittania
  New Hampshire Insurance, which is based in New York and is owned by Chartis Inc., can respond to the charges in an as-yet unscheduled administrative hearing. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
One Call Medical Palmetto Hospital Trust Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. [read post]