Search for: "Chartis Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But, the details are now at the heart of a legal dispute between Disney and AIG over $25 million that went to settle the Beef Products Inc. defamation lawsuit against the TV network and its reporter Jim Avila. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 26 October it will hand down judgment in Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd (formerly known as Chartis Insurance (UK) Ltd). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Alan Borst of Willie Borst ADR takes a look at the new and perhaps unappreciated exposures and risks posed by cyber counter-measures. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This afternoon New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced four new measures or actions being taken in New York purportedly to expedite and in response to Sandy-related insurance claims:today's issuance by the New York Department of Financial Services of an emergency amendment to New York Insurance Regulation 64 (11 NYCRR Part 216) reducing from 15 business days to 6 business days the time for insurers "to commence" an investigation of certain types of claims "occurring from October… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
This afternoon New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced four new measures or actions being taken in New York purportedly to expedite and in response to Sandy-related insurance claims:today's issuance by the New York Department of Financial Services of an emergency amendment to New York Insurance Regulation 64 (11 NYCRR Part 216) reducing from 15 business days to 6 business days the time for insurers "to commence" an investigation of certain types of claims "occurring from October 26, 2012 through… [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm by Law Lady
BROADVIEW ASSISTED LIVING and CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC., Appellees. 1st District.Criminal Acts: SANDUSKY'S HOMEOWNERS POLICY DOESN'T COVER SEX-ABUSE DEFENSE COSTS, INSURER SAYS, State Farm v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Judge Tauro followed Judge Parker’s excellent decision in Kahn Lucas Lancaster Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm by brittania
’s Chartis U.S., had underwritten the travel insurance that it and another Chartis business, Travel Guard Group Inc., marketed and sold on Travelocity or websites directly or indirectly powered by Travelocity. [read post]