Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 8:58 pm
The case cite is Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 7:13 am
(emphasis added)The District Court ruled that the primary function and incidental activities requirements imposed by the regulation were not a valid exercise of regulatory authority and were thus not valid requirements in determining what organizations are described in Code § 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).Before overriding the regulation, the District Court first had to determine that it had authority to do so under the Chevron deference doctrine arising under Chevron U.S.A.,… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 4:27 am
Total E & P U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
§ 1.78) are applied (...)Yes, the Supreme Court Chevron case comes up:Judge Andrews' decision that HTC was correct in challenging the priority of the '105, '181, and '720 patents was based in his determination that the PTO was not entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court decision in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court decision in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 202 Cal.App.4th 1342 (Jan. 25, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) held that the trial court erred by invoking the economic abstention doctrine at the pleading stage and dismissing the plaintiffs' UCL and CLRA claims. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:01 pm
The principle is named for the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
Applying step one of the doctrine articulated in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:59 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
California State Lands Commission (Chevron U.S.A., RPI) (1/27/12 Opn. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
As I shall explain, Scalia was right and Gorsuch is wrong.The Chevron Doctrine and Justice ScaliaThe Chevron doctrine gets its name from a 1984 case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:45 pm
Currently, in adjudicating challenges to administrative rulemaking and implementing actions, the federal courts invoke the precedent established in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
§ 706(2)(A).When reviewing an agency’s statutory interpretation, this court appliesthe two-step framework established in Chevron, U.S.A. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:27 pm
Because a majority ofthe judges participating in this en banc proceeding believethe statute is ambiguous on this point, we conclude in thealternative that there is no interpretation of the statuteby the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office(“PTO”) to which this court must defer under Chevron,U.S.A. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
§ 4208(e) (2006).4 See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:22 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 12:08 pm
For example, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
§ 706(2)(A), or unreasonable under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Nectow v. [read post]
